European Union · Authorisation
Authorisation under EMD2 and PSD2 from the National Competent Authority of your chosen member state, with passporting across all 30 EEA states by notification.
At a glance
Is this the right permission?
There is no single EU application and no single regulator. The decision that shapes cost, timeline and long-term substance obligations is which member state you apply in — and it is made before anything else.
Authorisation in one member state passports into all 30 EEA states by notification. If your customers are EU-based, this is the route — a UK EMI licence has carried no EEA passporting rights since Brexit, and no amount of UK permission substitutes for it.
There is no branch route. PSD2 requires authorisation to go to a legal person established in a member state, and national regulators read the head-office test as real decision-making in country — Ireland's Central Bank, for example, expects Financial Control, Legal & Compliance and Risk Management physically present.
EMD2 Article 9 allows member states to offer a lighter waiver below €5 million average outstanding e-money — Ireland runs it as Small EMI, Lithuania as a restricted licence. The trade-off is real: Lithuania's restricted licence is valid domestically only, with no passporting at all.
Jurisdiction choice is not a cost comparison. Ireland is slower but carries weight with banking partners; Lithuania is fastest but under materially tighter substance scrutiny since 2022; Malta sits between them. We scope this against your actual model before recommending one.
PSD3 and a new Payment Services Regulation have been provisionally agreed and are approaching publication. When they apply — not expected before late 2027 — EMD2 is repealed and e-money institutions become a sub-category of a single merged Payment Institution licence, with a 24-month transition for existing authorisations, extendable to 30 at the national regulator's discretion. It changes long-term planning, not the application you file today.
Overview
EU EMI authorisation runs through whichever National Competent Authority (NCA) you choose as your base — there's no single EU-wide regulator, and no single application. Once authorised, you passport across all 30 EEA states, but the notification isn't automatic and the choice of hub jurisdiction is itself a strategic decision, not a formality.
The €350,000 capital figure is the same number the UK inherited from the same original directive, but this is now a fully separate legal regime post-Brexit, assessed entirely on its own terms by your chosen NCA.
One thing worth knowing before you commit to a hub: PSD3 and a new EU Payment Services Regulation have been provisionally agreed by the European Parliament and Council and are approaching formal publication. When they take effect — not expected before late 2027 — EMD2 is repealed outright, and e-money institutions become a sub-category of a single merged Payment Institution licence rather than a separate authorisation type. Existing EMI authorisations get a genuine transition window, 24 months extendable to 30, so this is a real, dated development to factor into long-term planning, not an immediate concern.
Requirements in detail
Unlike the UK, there's no branch option — PSD2 requires authorisation to go to “a legal person established in a Member State,” so you need a real local entity, not a subsidiary of convenience. Neither PSD2 nor EMD2 actually defines “head office” — that's left to each NCA's own judgment, and in practice they read it as genuine substance: Ireland's Central Bank, for example, expects your Financial Control, Legal & Compliance and Risk Management functions physically in-country, with real board decisions taken there, not just a registered address.
€350,000 initial capital, the same figure the UK inherited from the same original directive — but the EU version is now a fully separate legal regime post-Brexit, assessed by whichever National Competent Authority (NCA) you apply to. EMD2 Article 9 provides a genuine lighter-touch route too: firms whose average outstanding e-money stays under €5,000,000 (averaged over the preceding six months) can apply for a waiver instead of full authorisation — Ireland runs this as a distinct "Small Electronic Money Institution" registration, Lithuania as a "restricted EMI" licence with no minimum capital and a lower fee, though the trade-off is real: a restricted EMI in Lithuania is valid only within Lithuania, with no EEA passporting. Exceed the threshold and you have 30 days to apply for full authorisation.
Board composition specifics vary by member state — see the jurisdiction comparison below — but a dedicated AML/CFT compliance officer with demonstrable expertise is a universal requirement at authorisation stage, regardless of which NCA you choose.
Your directors and senior managers go through a fit-and-proper assessment covering reputation, integrity, knowledge, skills and time to do the job properly, and your qualifying shareholders are assessed separately to confirm the ownership structure won't compromise sound management. Worth being precise about one commonly-repeated claim: EMD2 and PSD2 don't literally write in a numeric “at least two directors” rule — that specific phrasing comes from banking legislation (CRD IV), not the e-money directive. In practice, though, most NCAs apply an equivalent standard to EMIs anyway; Malta's MFSA explicitly expects at least two executive directors genuinely directing the business, so budget for it regardless of what the directive technically says.
Authorisation isn't the finish line. Safeguarding runs on the same two-method structure the UK inherited from the same directive — segregate relevant funds in a separate account or secure, liquid, low-risk assets, or cover them with an insurance policy or comparable guarantee from a provider outside your own corporate group. A statutory auditor is required, and — where you provide payment initiation or account information services alongside e-money issuance — Professional Indemnity Insurance meeting EBA minimum-amount guidelines. Budget for your chosen NCA's own ongoing supervisory levy too: Ireland runs an industry-wide tiered levy, Malta charges a fixed annual fee from €25,000 plus a formula-based component, and every NCA differs.
A scoping call maps your regulatory perimeter and confirms which regime actually applies — before any documentation work starts.
Time & cost
The three-month statutory period is the same across the EU. Almost nothing else is — which is why the honest answer to "how long" starts with "in which member state".
Ireland runs a 90 working-day statutory assessment that commonly extends well beyond it; Lithuania historically the fastest at six to twelve months; Malta around eight months indicative, closer to twelve with preparation. See the comparison below before committing.
Local premises, resident senior management and in-country control functions are conditions of authorisation, not things to arrange afterwards. This is the item that most often turns a nine-month plan into an eighteen-month one.
Every NCA works from EBA/GL/2017/09, which specifies eighteen categories of information — programme of operations, business plan, structural organisation, safeguarding, governance, security policy, AML controls, qualifying-holding and management suitability, and more. The list does not vary; the depth expected does.
Directors and senior managers are assessed on reputation, knowledge, skills and time commitment; qualifying shareholders are assessed separately on source of funds, PEP exposure and strategic intent. Each is an individual process with its own timetable.
The same figure the UK inherited from the same directive, but assessed independently by your chosen NCA. Article 9 waiver routes carry no minimum capital below €5 million outstanding e-money, at the cost of passporting.
Ireland charges no application fee and recovers cost through a tiered supervisory levy after authorisation. Lithuania is approximately €1,463 for a full EMI licence. Malta is €10,000 for a single category and €15,000 for both, effective January 2025.
Ireland levies through the Central Bank Industry Funding Levy; Malta charges a fixed annual supervisory fee from €25,000 plus a formula-based component. Substance costs — local staff and premises — usually exceed the regulatory fees.
Scoped and fixed once the jurisdiction decision is made, since that determines the shape of the pack, the substance requirements and the NCA's specific expectations. The jurisdiction analysis itself is part of the first engagement, not an afterthought.
Choosing your hub
Indicative — fees and timelines shift with each regulator’s own notices. We confirm current figures directly before you commit to a jurisdiction.
Process & timeline
3 months statutory · 6–18 months practical
Choose your NCA and build the full documentation suite around that jurisdiction's specific expectations — the biggest driver of both speed and long-term substance costs.
Submission to your chosen NCA and its review. Statutory minimums run three months, but real-world timelines vary sharply by jurisdiction — see the comparison below.
Final conditions — capital injection, safeguarding account, local substance confirmed — then formal authorisation and, once live, passporting notifications to any other EEA states you plan to serve.
What we prepare
53 documents, illustrative — safeguarding and governance documentation is tailored to your chosen NCA's specific expectations, not a single EU-wide template.
The firm's approach to customer due diligence, monitoring, screening and suspicious activity reporting.
+ supporting forms and registers
Your funds-protection method — segregation or insurance/comparable guarantee — under EMD2 Article 7, the same two-method structure the UK inherited from the same directive.
EBA/GL/2017/09, Guideline 7. + supporting forms
The firm's structure, reporting lines, responsibilities and internal control environment.
+ fit-and-proper files for management and qualifying shareholders
The firm's approach to systems, security controls, access management, incident response and mandatory fraud reporting.
+ supporting standards and registers
The commercial and operational backbone of the application — how the business runs and is governed.
+ supporting documentation and charts
Every document is written against your actual services, customers and jurisdictions — which is what makes it survive a regulator’s review and a bank’s due diligence alike.
Who does the work
Every application is scoped, built and submitted by senior team members who understand fintech and this specific regime — never delegated to a junior bench.
FAQ
It depends on your risk tolerance and timeline pressure, not just cost. Lithuania is historically the fastest route but under more substance scrutiny than a few years ago; Ireland is slower and more conservative but carries real weight with banking partners; Malta sits in between, with an established, dialogue-oriented regulator. We scope this against your actual business model before recommending one.
Not literally, and it's worth being precise about this. That exact phrasing comes from banking legislation (CRD IV), not EMD2 or PSD2. In practice, though, most national regulators — Malta's MFSA and the Bank of Lithuania explicitly among them — apply an equivalent standard to EMIs anyway, so treat it as a real practical requirement regardless of the technical source.
No — this is a genuine difference from the UK. PSD2 requires authorisation to go to a legal person established in a member state, so you need a real local entity with your head office genuinely there, not a subsidiary of convenience or a branch of a non-EEA company.
It isn't automatic. Once authorised in your home member state, you passport into other EEA states through a formal notification procedure via your NCA — a real, if usually straightforward, process rather than instant reach across all 30 states. Worth knowing: that 30-state reach itself took years to complete — Norway's implementation of PSD2 wasn't substantially finished until 2019–2021, well after EMD2's own EEA incorporation.
Three months is the statutory minimum once your application is deemed complete — in practice, most NCAs run additional information rounds that extend the real timeline to six to eighteen months, depending on the jurisdiction and how complete your first submission is. This is exactly why jurisdiction choice and preparation quality matter so much.
Yes, eventually, but not imminently. PSD3 and a new EU Payment Services Regulation have been provisionally agreed by the European Parliament and Council and are approaching formal publication, but application isn't expected before late 2027. When they do take effect, EMD2 is repealed outright and e-money institutions become a sub-category of a single merged Payment Institution licence, not a separate authorisation type. Existing EMI authorisations get a genuine transition window — 24 months, extendable to 30 at the NCA's discretion — so this is a real, dated development to factor into long-term planning, not an immediate concern.
Yes — EMD2 Article 9 provides a waiver route for firms whose average outstanding e-money stays under €5 million over the preceding six months, the same threshold figure the UK inherited into its own Small EMI regime. It's implemented differently by jurisdiction: Ireland runs it as a distinct "Small Electronic Money Institution" registration; Lithuania offers a "restricted EMI" licence with no minimum capital and a lower fee, but — the real trade-off — it's valid only within Lithuania, with no EEA passporting at all.
Other regimes
Book a scoping call and we’ll map your fastest, most defensible path to authorisation.